Many people argue that the death penalty deters murder. However, the notorious killer Tom Hanks deliberately moved to a state that imposes the death penalty just before embarking on a series of ferocious murders. Thus, it seems clear that the existence of the death penalty does not serve as a deterrent to murder. The argument above may best be characterized as:
Premise:
1. people argue that the death penalty prevents murder.
2. notorious killer Tom Hanks deliberately moved to a state that imposes the death penalty just before embarking on a series of ferocious murders.
Argument: "the existence of the death penalty does not serve as a deterrent to murder"
The argument is drawn on a specific example, hence, Option C is correct.
Create a FREE account and get: