In a follow up survey of the same kids two years later, it was found that all the kids were now in school. Of the kids who were not in school earlier, in on.e region, 25% were in G now, whereas the rest were enrolled in P; in the second region, all such kids were in G now; while in the third region, 50% of such kids had now joined G while the rest had joined P. As a result, in all three regions put together, 50% of the kids who were earlier out of school had joined G. It was also seen that no surveyed kid had changed schools.
What percentage of the surveyed kids in S, whose mothers had dropped out before completing primary education, were in G now?

Let us make note of the information given in the set.
The set states that rural kids were surveyed from 3 regions NE, West and South.
50 students each were surveyed from 150 villages in the NE, 250 villages from the West and 200 villages from the South.

Total number of kids from the NE = 150*50 = 7500
Total number of kids from the West = 250*50 = 12500
Total number of kids from the South = 200*50 = 10,000.

The table, given in the question, gives the number of students whose mothers dropped out before completing primary education. Therefore, the mothers of the remaining students should have completed primary education.

There are 7500 students from the NE in total. The mothers of 5000 of those students dropped out before completing primary education. Therefore, the remaining 2500 kids should have mothers who have completed primary education. 

 Let us make 2 tables - one representing the number of students and the other representing the number of students whose mother has completed primary education.

55% of the surveyed kids studied in schools run by the Government.
Number of kids studying in Govt. School should be 0.55*30000 = 16,500

From the given table, we know that the mothers of 13,500 kids who went to Govt. Schools dropped out of primary school.
Therefore, the remaining 16,500 - 13,500 = 3000 kids should have mother who have completed primary school.

37% of the surveyed kids study in private schools.
Number of kids studying in private schools should be 0.37*30000 = 11,100.
Number of kids in private schools whose mothers have completed primary school = 11,100 - 2700 = 8400.

8% of the surveyed kids did not go to school.
Number of kids who did not go to school = 0.08* 30000 = 2400
Number of kids not going to schools whose mothers have completed primary school = 2400 - 1800 = 600.

In S, 60% of the surveyed kids were in G.
Therefore, 6000 kids in S must be from G.

In NE, among the O kids, 50% had mothers who had dropped out before completing primary education.
There are 300 O kids whose mothers dropped out before completing primary education. These kids represent 50% of the total number of O-kids. Therefore, there must be 600 O-kids from NE - 300 kids should have mothers who dropped out before completing primary education and 300 kids should have mothers who have completed primary education.

The number of kids in G in NE was the same as the number of kids in G in W. Therefore, the number of kids in G in NE and the number of kids in G in W should be equal to 5250. Total number of kids:

Number of kids whose mothers have completed primary education:

 We have been given that in S, all surveyed kids whose mothers had completed primary education were in school. Therefore, the number of kids not going to school whose mothers have completed primary education in S should be 0. Filling the tables, we get,  

Total number of kids:

Number of kids whose mothers have completed primary education:

Number of kids who were out of school in the initial survey = 2400.
The number of kids who were out of school in NE is 600, W is 1500 and S is 300. 25% of the kids from one area, 100% of the kids from one area and 50% of the kids from another area are transferred to G. As a result, the number of kids who were not in school earlier but studying in G now became 50% of 2400 = 1200. 

 100% of the kids in W could not have been transferred to G (Since the total number of kids transferred to G is 1200 and the number of kids in W alone is 1500). 

 Let us assume that 100% of the kids from NE transferred (600). In this case, if 25% of the kids from W are transferred (375), 50% of the kids from S (300) will be transferred. The total in this case would be 600 + 375+ 300 = 1275. Therefore, we can eliminate this case. 

If 100% of the kids from NE (600), 25% of the kids from S (75) and 50% of the kids from W (750) are transferred, then the total would have been 1425. Therefore, we can eliminate this case as well.

If 50% of the kids from W (750), 25% of the kids from NE (150) and 100% of the kids from S (300) are transferred, then the total number of kids transferred to G would have been 750 + 150 + 300 = 1200. Therefore, this must have been the case. 

Already, 5100 kids whose mothers had dropped out were in G in S.
After the transfer, 300 more students will be added to the count.
Therefore, 5400 students whose mothers had dropped out will be in G in S.
Total number of kids whose mothers had dropped out in S = 5700

 Percentage = 5400/5700 = 94.73%. 

 Therefore, option A is the right answer.